Tag Archives: baseball cards

For-Real Interview: Josh Wilker

cardboardgods.jpgFor several years, there was a drug store in my neighborhood with a curious trading card vending machine. Half of its contents were of the Pokemon/Yu-Gi-Oh variety. The other half were old baseball cards. The newest ones were from the late 90s, the oldest dating back to 1987. I used to pop in once in a while and buy a pack or two, and the experience was always strange. Invariably, the packs would be filled with no-names, has-beens, and never was-es, the same as they were when I was young. And yet, I’d spent so much time collecting cards as a kid, even the humblest of bench warmers brought back some kind of memory.

I had the cruel misfortune of getting into baseball just as most games were being gobbled up by cable, in a household where getting cable was an unthinkable luxury. We didn’t live close enough to NYC (or have enough disposable income) to see many games in person, either; we’d manage to get to one or two games a year, but that was the limit. Baseball cards were my closest connection to the game.

That’s why it was doubly annoying to spend the little money I did have on a pack of cards, only to get a pile of nobodies. The worst one of all: Doug Sisk. He was easily the most useless member of the 1986 Mets (and, as revealed by The Bad Guys Won, its worst human being), and yet every single pack of 1987 Topps I ever bought had at least one Doug Sisk in it. Some had two. I swear I once purchased a pack with four Doug Sisk cards in it.

I once got into a car accident because some idiot ran a red light, then tried to Gaslight me by insisting I was the one who ran a red light. I don’t think I was as mad the day this happened as I was the day I got four Doug Sisks in one pack.

Looking at cards as an adult is a far different experience. You look at the “heroes” and realize that hitting or throwing a baseball really hard doesn’t exactly make someone a hero. And you look at the quote-unquote scrubs, and you realize that these were all young men who rose to the absolute highest level of their profession, only to flatline there.

That’s my long way of saying that Josh Wilker’s Cardboard Gods spoke to me in a way that few books ever have. In it, Wilker recounts his unorthodox upbringing in 1970s Vermont in short chapters, each prefaced by a baseball card he collected as a kid, which acts as a Greek chorus to the drama unfolding in his young life.

Cardboard Gods began its life in 2006 as a blog of the same name and quickly distinguished itself from the sports blog pack with its amazing, heartfelt writing. The word “blog” seems inadequate to capture Wilker’s web site, and his book also defies description and categorization. It’s not a mere sports book, or simply a coming-of-age story, or a memoir. It is truly something I’ve never seen in print before.

I have been recommending this book to anyone who will listen, regardless of whether they are baseball fans or not. Simply put, it is one of the best things I’ve ever read. I agree 100 percent with Rob Neyer’s cover blurb: “Josh Wilker writes as beautifully about baseball and life as anyone ever has.”

It’s also one of the best designed books I’ve come across in many a moon. The dust jacket is made of a waxy paper similar to the kind that’s surrounded baseball cards for generations. The section splash pages (the book is divided into four “packs”) use family pictures done up in the style of 1980 Topps cards. And the cover promises “1 stick of bubble gum”, represented opposite the copyright page by a smashed length of crackly gum, the kind that destroyed millions of young tongues over the years (see below for why the real thing was not included).

Thumbnail image for bevacqua_77.jpgBut the real attraction remains the prose itself. For instance, he begins a chapter on the growing distance between himself and his older brother by commenting on a card of Kurt Bevacqua, a utility man best known for setting the Topps-sponsored bubble blowing record, and last seen in baseball card form occupying some Beckett-esque existential wasteland:

The last time I’d seen Kurt Bevacqua was in 1977, in a card that showed him to be adrift in a blurry, ethereal netherworld, wearing, or appearing to wear, the doctored cap and uniform of an expansion team that had yet to officially exist and for whom he would never play a single game. Behind him, the lifeless, bulldozed plain of a landfill, or perhaps a dormant spring training complex stripped of all its accessories. No batting cages, no pitching machines, no stands, no bases. All in all, Kurt Bevacqua seemed to be in the process of passing through some sort of veil separating the Big Leagues from the Great Beyond. He didn’t seem to be pleased.

“What the fuck is going on?” he seemed to be saying.

Josh was kind enough to spare some time for a few questions via email about blogging as an antidote for writer burnout, the decrepitude of post-Seaver Shea in the 70s, and booksellers’ reluctance to sell products with gum included.

Continue reading For-Real Interview: Josh Wilker

Warm Thoughts for a Cold Winter: Topps’ Photo Retouching Skills

A recent post at Mets Guy in Michigan concentrated on what may be the worst Mets-related baseball card of all time (and perhaps the worst baseball card of all time, period): a Hostess-produced card for Rusty Staub in which the photo retouching is abysmal. I won’t recount the story here; just click on this link and marvel at how horrible it is (and the interesting hypothesis forwarded to explain its hideousness).

The post also touched on a longtime feature of baseball cards: the hastily altered player photo. Back in the days of no Photoshop and longer production schedules, it wasn’t always possible for the baseball card people to get a picture of a player in his new duds if he was traded in the offseason. Or even if he was traded the year before, since back then, most baseball card photos were taken during the previous season. And by my own amateur sleuthing, most of them were taken in either New York or LA. So if were swapped midseason and never made another trip to either coast, there might be no pics of you in your current uni.

69_rusty.jpgFor a good chunk of the 1960s, Topps (the biggest baseball card producer) didn’t much care for verisimiltude. If a player was suddenly traded before the cards were made, they just used a generic, hatless picture, or blacked out his hat entirely, as evidenced by Rusty Staub’s 1969 Topps card (seen to your right). Rusty went from the Astros to the Expos in a very late offseason trade (January 22), and since Montreal had yet to play a game, Topps–rather than find out what the Expos’ uniforms might look like–scraped away the Houston logo on his helmet and called it a day.

Beginning in the early 1970s, Topps either decided this method was not worthy of their standards or hired some very ambitious/anal art directors. Because at this time, they began to document a player’s new home to the best of their abilities–as ham-fisted and transparent as those efforts might appear.

When I was a kid and mired in a baseball card obsession, I bought a whole box of cards from 1977 for like five bucks. Why 1977? Because (a) that’s the year I was born, and (b) it was the first year the Blue Jays and Mariners played, which at the time was the last MLB expansion. This historical fact fascinated me for dumb little kid reasons.

Topps wanted to document the freshman year for those two teams, of course. But since neither had yet taken the field, they had to improvise. In some cases, they did so admirably. In others, not so much.

Even as a young’un, I could tell something was off about some of these cards. I even recognized bad paint jobs on some of these unfortunate players. It was necessary for the aforementioned Toronto and Seattle squads, since this was their inaugural year, but they weren’t the only teams treated to some paintbrushery.
Continue reading Warm Thoughts for a Cold Winter: Topps’ Photo Retouching Skills

Party Like It’s 1999

There’s a drug store a few blocks away from my house that has a mysterious Card Vending Machine. The bottom half of the machine–which would be eye level with most preteens–contains Pokemon cards, Yu-Gi-Oh, etc.

The top half has packs of old baseball cards. Some are very old, 20 years and up (although it makes me want to slit my wrists to think that I can remember collecting cards that are now more than 20 years old).

That would be weird enough. But whenever I go to this drugstore, the inventory changes. So they’re constantly restocking this machine with different vintages. Topps, Fleer, Donruss, and all the weird variants that these companies foisted on the card-buying public back when card collecting still looked like a viable investment market (haven’t spotted Sportflix yet, though).

My guess as to how this happened: There’s some guy out there who bought up thousands and thousands of packs of baseball cards back in the aforementioned Baseball Card Bull Market. He had a friend who snatched up a trading card vending machine franchise during the height of Pokemon-mania. When the bottoms dropped out of these hobbies, they joined forces in a marriage of convenience that made no one really happy, but at least it allowed them to not take a total loss on their investments.

Whatever the origin of the Mystery Machine, I always buy a pack of old cards when I’m in this drug store. Every other time I’ve gone there, I’ve purchased cards from when I was a kid and still collected them, for pure nostalgia’s sake. Not that I expect to find anything of value, because there’s very little of value in the baseball card market. And if these packs had anything of value, they wouldn’t be sitting in a weird vending machine in Queens.

But a few weeks, I went out of my comfort zone and purchased some Topps cards from 1999. That year has a special place in my heart, as I’m sure I’ve mentioned before. It was really the year I got back into baseball. I dipped my toe into the water the year before, but 1999 was the year I said “fuck it” and jumped right in.

What did I get? Irony, mostly.

The pack had a Future Stars card with Scott Rolen, which declared him “a cornerstone for the Phillies for years to come” (well, they were partly right). There was another card that featured first-round Mets bust Jason Tyner, and another Prospects card with three players on it, none of whom I’d ever heard of.

Of course, I saved my most jaundiced views for The Roid Brigade. It just so happened I purchased these cards just as the A-Rod Mess was reaching its apex. So it was hard to find a Juan Gonzalez card and not think about how much more innocent/stupid people were about steroids ten years ago.

Although I don’t entirely buy this line of reasoning. I feel like, more than anything, it’s a line that sportswriters throw out there so they don’t look like the blind, jock-sniffing morons they are. Fans always suspected steroids in the game; they just didn’t care until ESPN et al told us to be surprised and outraged by it.

Especially when you consider the Topps cover boy for that year. Who was it? I’ll give you three guesses.

99topps.jpgI guess McGwire and Sosa were too expensive even for Topps in 1999. But The Rocket was just as good, right? Nothing could ever taint his accomplishments!